Mafia IV - Lord of the Rings -

[mayx]

As this is my first mafia game I really watch what other people write and try to understand it better, I see there is not many stupid people to reveal information. I am not really sure what to do myself, kind of confused I am atm.
I personally think TTaM is immune to lynch, RNG is also an option imo, but it is better to vote based on  the info we have.

[Skymunken]

That's cool, but we need people to get a discussion going instead of just going "fuck debate, we'll rng the first day!"

[Nachmanun]

What if TTaM is the dark lord, is he even lynchable if he is?
Pretty sure his declaration is required of the role rather than TTaM having some kind of doublebluff stroke of genious.

What if his claims are true aswell, that we can trade blues names for reds? If we seem to have some kind of doctor, blue could be kept alive or we could just vigilante-kill whichever reds name we find out? I think it's something worth exploring atleast. If not we could just kill him tomorrow.

[Hugman]

No.

We will not be revealing any blues. That would be uber dumb.

[Skymunken]

My brain is completely farting, it's green and blue vs red, correct?

[Surim]

Yes Anders, it is Green + Blue vs Red. So with that, what would the harm of revealing a Blue to possibly get a Red's name? I would still stand by my previous statement saying that Matt could reveal a person who he claims is red, but in fact isnt and we would land up lynching a fellow townie.

[Skymunken]

We have no idea who's who, how would you reveal a blue, and can we even trust TTaM to give red names in return? He says he is the dark lord after all, and that sounds like a pretty evil guy to be trusting like that.

[Palmar]

Barring a better lynch we kill TTaM for stupid. The chances of there being a role that actually forces someone to claim red in the game.

I am going to re-read the thread later and I'll point out some stuff I notice. In addition, those of you who haven't posted at all should probably start doing so now.

[Palmar]

I meant to say the chances are very small.

In addition, we'll be stuck thinking about it forever if he's telling the truth or not.

Claim scum -> die.

If he's town he's dumb.

[Surim]

I believe you would need to be an absolute retard to have your first and only post claiming to be Red without there being some sort of ability that would prevent you from being lynched. No matter how bad you are, you wouldnt admit to being red without having some sort of ability hidden somewhere

[Skymunken]

Grilly, what's your logic for voting for Grishnag?

Just curious, since he haven't said anything.

[Skymunken]

Fuck my brain, by Grilly was I referring to Hugman.

[Hugman]

Grilly, what's your logic for voting for Grishnag?

Just curious, since he haven't said anything.

[Palmar]

why would you choose to vote for grishnag over the guy who claimed red hug?

[Skymunken]

By statistics, Grishnag is most likely to post in the time-space between ~16:00-24:00!

But voting for them when they haven't said anything yet is maybe a bit premature when we know for a fact that TTaM is red (well almost). We need to decide whether it's a "safe" call to try lynch TTaM, since I strongly believe he will have lynch immunity of some sort.